Skip to content

AI infrastructure & unit economics · independent consulting

Nobody owns a cost they can’t see.

I find the AI and cloud spend nobody owns, attribute it to the teams that can act on it, and rank the waste by dollars. I worked on cloud and AI infrastructure in big tech, at Apple, Meta and Roku, and I build unalloc, an open-source tool for exactly this.

Questions welcome · ready to hire? rates & fit check

Tim Urista

Tim Urista · Connect on LinkedIn

The unalloc ledger explorer on its hybrid-org sample month. Spend by team shows agents at $6,699, search at $5,580 and platform at $1,440, while the unallocated bar dominates at $27,702, 66.9% of spend. Below, a resolution bar splits rows into 33.1% with an owner label and 66.9% with no owner.
unalloc, my open-source attribution tool · synthetic sample month

Work you can inspect

Built, run and measured by me

Products and tools I operate myself. Each one links to the write-up, with the commits behind it.

All case studies →

What I do

Spend less on AI. Get more out of it.

Three kinds of work, one discipline: measure the unit that matters, then change the system until the number moves.

Writing · Human in the Loop

What the commit history actually says

Field notes on managing AI-assisted software delivery: how I scope the work, what I check before anything ships, and the bugs that got through anyway.

All writing →
  1. Guide

    Sep 15, 2026 · 11 min · unalloc

    Who pays for the KV cache? Designing showback for shared LLM inference

    A guide for platform and FinOps leads who have to split shared AI spend: which meter to charge by, where idle capacity goes, how to give every dollar one path into the ledger, and what a joined ledger can answer. Backed by measurements from unalloc, my open-source cost-attribution tool.

  2. Part 10

    Sep 14, 2026 · 11 min · unalloc

    unalloc: checking a cost-attribution tool before anyone quotes its numbers

    How I scoped and checked unalloc, an open-source tool that joins Kubernetes and LLM provider bills: nine defects caught before release, a budget-capped H100 run with a verified teardown, a paper build that refuses silent typos, and a headline I softened because no meter is ground truth.

  3. Part 2

    Sep 13, 2026 · 11 min · TrendVesting

    TrendVesting: validating 2.5 years of production AI

    How I review and validate an AI trading system I own: change records with production numbers, invariant tests, reconciliation audits and calibration checks, and the numbers they overturned.

Free lesson · 10 minutes · no sign-up

Ready, warm, useful

Why a replica can pass its readiness check while the first users still wait. An interactive timeline separates readiness, a cold prefix cache and the queue.

Books

Make agent work easier to check

PDF books for developers and leads working with Claude Code. See the request, inspect the output, plan the work and read the evidence.

Books and kits →

Try it

AI cost teardown

Describe a workload in a sentence. Get a monthly estimate, a unit cost, and the levers, the way I’d sketch it on a first call.

Estimates from a language model. Useful for orientation, not a quote.

🧾

AI Cost Teardown

Describe an AI or cloud workload in plain English. You'll get a fully-loaded monthly estimate, a per-unit cost, and the highest-leverage ways to cut it. Live, powered by Claude.

Rates

Published prices. Cash-pay.

Invoiced directly, paid by ACH or card. No platforms or agencies in the middle.

Rates & fit check

Advisory hours

$250/hr

2-hour minimum

Executive Cost Briefing

$2,500

90 minutes

Unit Economics Sprint

from $5,000

1 day

AI Cost & Unit Economics Audit

$12k–$25k

1–2 weeks

ML Cost & Reliability Evals

$15k–$30k

2 weeks

AI-native rebuild

Fixed quote

After a Sprint

Questions or feedback?
I reply to every note.

Say hi